Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and La Rue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.
Buy this ebook and get 1 more FREE!
Language English ● Format EPUB ● ISBN 9781461640363 ● Publisher Rowman & Littlefield Publishers ● Published 2006 ● Downloadable 6 times ● Currency EUR ● ID 2757931 ● Copy protection Adobe DRM
Requires a DRM capable ebook reader